Uh huh...sure...
Just sounds like more fear of the foreskin to me.
Study claims that uncircumcised men are more at HIV risk than circumcised men.
Just sounds like more skin-ism and fear of the man in the hood.
10 years ago, foreskin caused an increased risk of HPV in the sexual partners of uncircumcised men...since proven false. Equal risk. And the list goes on...herpes, gonorrhea...there have been dozens or more reports claiming this or that and aiming it at those not factored by the Covenant of Abraham.
Ladies, it's more important that your partner keeps his equipment clean than whether or not he has a hood.
And this lead me to the process of foreskin restoration...which just sounds horrible to me. Click here.
I can't believe I just did a post about circumcision and foreskin...somebody shoot me.
Study claims that uncircumcised men are more at HIV risk than circumcised men.
Just sounds like more skin-ism and fear of the man in the hood.
10 years ago, foreskin caused an increased risk of HPV in the sexual partners of uncircumcised men...since proven false. Equal risk. And the list goes on...herpes, gonorrhea...there have been dozens or more reports claiming this or that and aiming it at those not factored by the Covenant of Abraham.
Ladies, it's more important that your partner keeps his equipment clean than whether or not he has a hood.
And this lead me to the process of foreskin restoration...which just sounds horrible to me. Click here.
I can't believe I just did a post about circumcision and foreskin...somebody shoot me.
posted by Mark "Puff" Anderson | 12:28 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home